Synopsis
In a recent interview with Generative A.I. program ChatGPT 4o, I explored four key questions typically posed to a creative human. The insightful feedback touched on the reimagining of original compositions for online platforms, the creative process itself, the similarities and differences between music and art, and the span of A.I. ‘s creative career.
Surprising Findings
What surprised me about this interview with Generative A.I. was how often the responses were clarified to acknowledge they were from an A.I. not a human. I was inspired by the depth of information in each answer, far from the bland responses I expected. The real challenge came when I tried to write the questions exactly as I had for the human interview.
The Juxtaposition
When I compared my ideas, my human interviewee’s responses, and the generative AI interview, the striking juxtaposition revealed a common thread: creativity. It wasn’t just in how the questions were asked or the topics covered, but in how they were answered. Creativity was the driving force behind both human and AI responses, shaping each interaction uniquely.
Final Thoughts
My interview with the generative A.I. of ChatGPT 4o, has left me with much to ponder about the intersection of creativity, technology, and education. The experience was both insightful and thought-provoking, revealing the potential for A.I. to play a role in reshaping how we think about teaching and learning. After this experience, I will continuously follow the development of generative A.I. with greater interest, particularly in how it might be utilized in education—especially within the traditional classroom setting with a human educator. This exploration has sparked my curiosity about the future of creativity and innovation in both teaching methods and learning environments.
References
Anj. (2024, September 29). interview with A.I. [video]. https://youtu.be/xMByHv33vpY?si=P5E4m9rkrM33bCYN